Choosing a Platform: Carbon AM67 OSM-MF vs. Nitrogen952 SMARC

Published on October 20, 2026

Two strong platforms with different strengths. The Carbon AM67 OSM-MF and the Nitrogen952 SMARC both target industrial HMI, medical devices, smart appliances, and vision systems, but they approach the problem from different angles. The AM67 is TI silicon on a compact solder-down module with a vision pipeline. The i.MX 952 is NXP silicon on a SMARC module with functional safety and a strong security architecture. The right silicon depends on what your product actually needs to do.

The Core Difference in One Sentence

The Carbon AM67 is the stronger choice for vision-heavy, multi-camera, and triple-display designs. The Nitrogen952 is the stronger choice for designs that need functional safety certification, the latest NXP security architecture, or the flexibility of a SMARC module.

Form Factor

Before comparing specs, it's worth addressing the form factor question directly because it shapes every other decision. The Carbon AM67 uses the OSM-MF v1.2 standard: 45×30mm, solder-down, permanent. The Nitrogen952 uses SMARC 2.2: 82×50mm, edge connector. 

This isn't about one being better. It's about what suits your design. OSM makes sense when you want the smallest possible board footprint and don't need to swap modules in the field. SMARC makes sense when you want to develop and potentially upgrade to a different processor without a carrier board respin. The SMARC 2.2 standard means a carrier designed for the Nitrogen8M Plus or Nitrogen937 is compatible with the Nitrogen952. 

Ezurio will have an i.MX 952 OSM-MF module coming, so if you're committed to OSM form factor and want NXP silicon, that path will exist. For now, if you need OSM today, the Carbon AM67 is it.

When the Carbon AM67 is the Right Choice

The AM67 is the stronger platform when:

  • Your design needs multiple camera inputs. Four independent MIPI-CSI-2 interfaces is the AM67's clearest win. The i.MX 952 has one configurable interface. For machine vision, inspection systems, multi-camera HMI, or anything with more than two camera needs. 
  • You need USB 3.0 throughput. The AM67 has USB 3.1 Gen1 at 5 Gbps. The i.MX 952 is USB 2.0 only. If your design connects to external storage, high-bandwidth USB peripherals, or USB3 cameras. 
  • You're driving three displays simultaneously. AM67 supports triple independent display output. MIPI-DSI plus two LVDS simultaneously. The i.MX 952 supports two.
  • Your AI workload maps to DSP-style vision processing. The two C7x deep learning accelerators in the AM67 are great for optical flow, video analytics, and inference. The i.MX 952's Neutron NPU is better for standard classification and detection inference models. 
  • Board space is tight. At 45×30mm, the OSM-MF footprint is significantly smaller than a SMARC module. For compact designs, OSM form factor wins.
  • You're on TI's software ecosystem or have team experience there. Yocto BSPs, the TI SDK, and toolchain familiarity are factors in schedule.
CarbonAM67 front.399.png

Where the Nitrogen952 is the Right Choice

The Nitrogen952 is the stronger platform when:

  • You need safety certification. ASIL-B / SIL-2 capable hardware backed by NXP's SafeAssure framework. The AM67 has no formal safety certification path. If your product goes through IEC 61508, IEC 60601, or ISO 26262, the i.MX 952 is the only option between these two. 
  • Security compliance is driving requirements. The EdgeLock Secure Enclave is better aligned with EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance and current medical device cybersecurity regulations than the AM67's architecture. Both are secure; the i.MX 952's architecture is better documented against these specific frameworks. 
  • You're driving three displays simultaneously. AM67 supports triple independent display output. MIPI-DSI plus two LVDS simultaneously. The i.MX 952 supports two.
  • You want a swappable module. SMARC 2.2's edge connector means you can develop with one module and upgrade to another without a carrier board respin. For products with long lifecycles or have a standard layout for multiple product lines, this matters. Your design has multiple CAN-FD nodes. The Nitrogen 952 has three CAN-FD interfaces. The AM67 has two.
  • You want 2.5 GbE networking. The Nitrogen 952 optionally brings a 2.5 GbE port, useful for higher-bandwidth industrial protocols and edge connectivity.  
  • Your team is on the NXP ecosystem. BSP familiarity, existing carrier board investments, and NXP's eIQ ML toolchain are factors if your team has been building on i.MX. 
Nitrogen95 SMARC with Sona NX611

Key Specifications


Category Specification Carbon AM67 OSM-MF Nitrogen952 SMARC What It Means
Processing Processor TI AM67A / AM675
4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
NXP i.MX 952
4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz
The A55 has better IPC. The AM67A has more accelerators.
AI / ML 2x C7x DSP/DL
4 TOPS
eIQ Neutron NPU
2 eTOPS
Different architectures. Don't compare TOPS directly.
Multimedia Camera / Vision 4x MIPI-CSI-2 (4-lane)
600 MP/s ISP
1x MIPI-CSI
500 MP/s ISP w/ RGB-IR
AM67 is built for multi-camera vision.
Display MIPI-DSI + 2x LVDS
Up to 3 simultaneous
MIPI-DSI + 2x LVDS
Up to 2 simultaneous
Three panels requires the AM67.
Safety & Security Functional Safety None ASIL-B / SIL-2 capable Only the 952 has a path to IEC 61508 or ISO 26262.
Security TI HSM, secure boot
ARM TrustZone
EdgeLock Secure Enclave
PQC boot
PQC boot fits EU CRA and medical requirements.
I/O & Memory USB 1x USB 3.1 Gen1
1x USB 2.0
2x USB 2.0 AM67 is the only option for USB 3.0.
PCIe 1x PCIe Gen3 x1 1x PCIe Gen3 x1
(muxed with 2.5 GbE)
On the 952, pick PCIe or 2.5 GbE at design time.
Memory 4GB or 8GB LPDDR4 Up to 8GB LPDDR4X / LPDDR5 The 952 adds LPDDR5 bandwidth.
Platform Form Factor OSM-MF v1.2
45 × 30 mm, solder-down
SMARC 2.2
82 × 50 mm, socketed
OSM is smaller and permanent. SMARC is easier to swap.

What We're Seeing in the Market

A few patterns come up when customers are choosing between these two platforms.

Vision focused designs go AM67. Industrial inspection, navigation systems, multi-camera kiosks, and medical imaging devices that need to process feeds from more than one camera are a great fit for the Carbon AM67's vision pipeline. The combination of four MIPI-CSI interfaces and the dedicated optical flow accelerator is built for this. Trying to replicate that in software on the i.MX 952 adds CPU overhead and cost. 

Safety-certified designs go 952. Any product going through a formal functional safety certification process like medical class II/III devices, industrial machinery under IEC 62443, safety-rated HMI panels needs hardware that supports a safety case. The AM67 doesn't have that path. The i.MX 952 does. 

General HMI and smart appliance designs can go either way. For a single-display or dual-display touchscreen product without specific vision requirements or safety certification needs, both platforms are capable. Form factor preference, ecosystem familiarity, and board layout tend to be the deciding factors.

Ezurio's Take

We built both products because we don't think one platform wins everywhere. The Carbon AM67 OSM-MF comes with evaluation kits to test your product. The Nitrogen952 SMARC is will have availability for customers working on designs that need it. Contact us if you're planning ahead on a i.MX 952-based product. 

Both modules carry Ezurio's standard approach: optional integrated Wi-Fi 6/6E and Bluetooth, industrial temperature options, BSP support across Yocto, Buildroot, Android, and QNX, and worldwide regulatory certifications. The form factors are different: OSM-MF for solder-down production designs, SMARC 2.2 for upgradeable platforms, but the support model is the same. 

Beyond hardware, we provide the application engineering support that actually helps you ship: BSP bring up assistance, carrier board design reviews, RF and antenna guidance, and regulatory certifications including FCC, IC, CE, UKCA, RCM, MIC, KC, and Bluetooth SIG. US-based manufacturing for customers with domestic supply chain requirements, with global capacity through our Ezurio footprint for EMEA and APAC.

Final Takeaways

If your product has more than one camera, needs USB 3.0, drives three displays, or has to fit in a tight board, Carbon AM67. If your product needs safety certification, the NXP security architecture for compliance, or you want the long-term upgrade flexibility of SMARC 2.2, then Nitrogen952. 

If neither of those is a clear differentiator for your application, talk to our applications engineering team. We'll dig into your specific requirements and tell you honestly which one makes more sense or whether a different platform is a better fit altogether. 

Ready to evaluate the Carbon AM67 OSM-MF, visit www.ezurio.com/carbon-am67 to learn more.

To find out more about the Nitrogen952 SMARC, visit www.ezurio.com/nitrogen952-smarc. 

Contact our engineering team or visit ezurio.com for datasheets, evaluation kits, and design support.